Three standard results, one telescoping trick, and a limit. Between them they close every FP1 series question — and the marks are almost all in the presentation.
These three are printed in MF19 — you are not asked to memorise them, only to use them fluently and to factorise the answer at the end.
The fourth one you do have to remember, because it looks too obvious to write down:
Summation is linear, so you may split a sum term by term and pull constants out:
It is not multiplicative: . Always expand the bracket first.
Find in a fully factorised form.
Take out the common factor — this is the step that earns the final mark:
Check with : the series is , and . ✓
Find . The standard results only run from , so subtract the missing head:
Common factor :
Check with : the series is , and . ✓
Comparing the first and third results, . It is a genuine identity, it is a favourite induction exercise, and it is a fast sanity check: . ✓
When the general term is a fraction, the standard results are useless. Instead force the term into the shape something minus the next something — then almost everything cancels down the middle. This is telescoping.
If you can write , then
because every interior appears once positive and once negative. Only the ends survive.
Find .
Partial fractions: , which is already with . Writing out the terms:
Check with : , and . ✓
Find . Here , so each negative piece cancels the positive piece two rows later, not one:
Hence, halving and putting it over a common denominator,
Check with : , and . ✓
A very common CAIE wording. (i) Show that . (ii) Hence find .
(i) Over a common denominator,
(ii) So the term is with , and the sum telescopes:
Check with : , and . ✓
Write out the first three brackets and the last two in full, with the dots between them. That display is worth method marks on its own, and it is the only reliable way to see how many terms survive at each end.
The syllabus is precise about the route: you decide convergence by direct consideration of the sum to terms. So there is only ever one method.
From the sums found above:
so and . But
so diverges — it has no sum to infinity.
Divide numerator and denominator by the highest power of present, then use . For , divide top and bottom by :
Writing " as " explicitly is what scores; a bare answer usually does not.
Terms getting smaller does not guarantee convergence, and the syllabus does not want you to argue from the terms at all. Find first, then take the limit of . That is the whole examinable method.
Pick a series, then slide . The panel adds the terms up one by one and compares that running total with the closed form from the notes above — so you can see for yourself that the formula is right. The strip underneath shows exactly which pieces cancel.
the middle always cancels ✎
equals:
. The distractor is what you get if you sum as — i.e. if you start at . Check : . ✓
equals:
. Check : . ✓
Given , the sum is:
Only the ends survive: .
For , equals:
Each negative piece cancels the positive piece two rows later, so two survive at each end: . Check : , and . ✓
(i) Show that .
(ii) Hence find , and deduce the sum to infinity.
(i) Common denominator :
(ii) So with the general term is , and the sum telescopes to the two ends:
Over a common denominator this is the fully factorised form
Sum to infinity: as , , so . Hence .
Check with : , and . ✓