← Hub FP2 · 08 · Hyperbolic 0%
Paper 2 · Further Pure 2 ✦

Hyperbolic Functions

Built from ex and e−x, they behave almost exactly like sine and cosine — with a handful of sign flips that decide several marks a paper.

Syllabus 2.1Log forms given by MF19…but you must be able to derive them

What the examiner expects you to do

§1 The definitions — everything comes from these

◆ The six functions
sinh⁡x=ex−e−x2,cosh⁡x=ex+e−x2,tanh⁡x=sinh⁡xcosh⁡x=ex−e−xex+e−x, sech⁡x=1cosh⁡x,cosech⁡x=1sinh⁡x,coth⁡x=1tanh⁡x=cosh⁡xsinh⁡x.

These definitions are not on MF19. Everything else in this topic can be rebuilt from them, so learn them first and learn them cold.

◇ Two consequences worth memorising separately
cosh⁡x+sinh⁡x=ex,cosh⁡x−sinh⁡x=e−x.

Adding and subtracting the definitions gives them instantly, and they turn a great many "solve this hyperbolic equation" questions into a quadratic in ex.

Parity: cosh⁡ is even (cosh⁡(−x)=cosh⁡x); sinh⁡ and tanh⁡ are odd. That is why cosh⁡x=k has two solutions ±, while sinh⁡x=k has exactly one.

★ Where the name comes from

cos2⁡t+sin2⁡t=1 parametrises the circle x2+y2=1; cosh2⁡t−sinh2⁡t=1 parametrises the hyperbola x2−y2=1. One sign, one whole family of functions.

§2 The graphs

◇ What each sketch must show
FunctionShape and key featuresRange
cosh⁡xeven, U-shaped, minimum at (0,1); grows like 12ex as x→∞y≥1
sinh⁡xodd, through the origin, always increasing; also grows like 12exall real y
tanh⁡xodd, through the origin, increasing, S-shaped, with horizontal asymptotes y=±1−1<y<1
sech⁡xeven, bell-shaped, maximum at (0,1), →0 both ways0<y≤1
cosech⁡xodd, undefined at x=0; asymptotes x=0 and y=0y≠0
coth⁡xodd, undefined at x=0; asymptotes x=0 and y=±1|y|>1

The most-marked features are the minimum at (0,1) for cosh⁡, and the y=±1 asymptotes for tanh⁡. Sketch them and label them.

★ A* tip — the shape of cosh, explained in one line

cosh⁡x=12ex+12e−x is the sum of two exponential curves, so far to the right the 12ex dominates and far to the left the 12e−x does. sinh⁡x is the same two curves subtracted, which is why it dives below the axis on the left. Watch this happen in the visualiser.

§3 Identities — and Osborn's rule

◆ The core identities MF19 gives the starred three
cosh2⁡x−sinh2⁡x≡1 ⋆,sinh⁡2x≡2sinh⁡xcosh⁡x ⋆,cosh⁡2x≡cosh2⁡x+sinh2⁡x ⋆, 1−tanh2⁡x≡sech2⁡x,coth2⁡x−1≡cosech2⁡x, sinh⁡(A±B)≡sinh⁡Acosh⁡B±cosh⁡Asinh⁡B,cosh⁡(A±B)≡cosh⁡Acosh⁡B±sinh⁡Asinh⁡B.

The two rearrangements of cosh⁡2x do most of the work in equations and integrals:

cosh⁡2x≡2cosh2⁡x−1≡1+2sinh2⁡x.
Proof of cosh2⁡x−sinh2⁡x≡1 — the template for every other proof

Go straight back to the exponential definitions and expand:

cosh2⁡x−sinh2⁡x=(ex+e−x2)2−(ex−e−x2)2=(e2x+2+e−2x)−(e2x−2+e−2x)4=44=1. ■

Notice that ex⋅e−x=1 is what produces the middle terms ±2. Every hyperbolic proof in this course works the same way: write both sides in terms of ex and e−x, and simplify. There is no cleverness required.

Proof of cosh⁡2x≡1+2sinh2⁡x
1+2sinh2⁡x=1+2(ex−e−x2)2=1+e2x−2+e−2x2=2+e2x−2+e−2x2=e2x+e−2x2=cosh⁡2x. ■
★ Osborn's rule — for remembering, never for proving

Take any standard trigonometric identity, replace cos⁡→cosh⁡ and sin⁡→sinh⁡, and then change the sign of every term containing a product of two sines.

TrigonometricHyperbolicSign flipped?
cos2⁡x+sin2⁡x≡1cosh2⁡x−sinh2⁡x≡1yes — sin2⁡ is sin⁡×sin⁡
sin⁡2x≡2sin⁡xcos⁡xsinh⁡2x≡2sinh⁡xcosh⁡xno — only one sinh⁡
cos⁡2x≡cos2⁡x−sin2⁡xcosh⁡2x≡cosh2⁡x+sinh2⁡xyes
sec2⁡x≡1+tan2⁡xsech2⁡x≡1−tanh2⁡xyes — tanh2⁡ hides sinh⁡×sinh⁡

Watch tanh2⁡, coth2⁡ and cosech2⁡: each secretly contains sinh⁡×sinh⁡, so each flips.

⚠ If the question says "prove", Osborn scores nothing. Go back to ex and e−x. Osborn is for checking your memory in the margin.

§4 Inverse hyperbolic functions and their logarithmic forms

◇ Domains and ranges
InverseDomainRangeWhy
arsinh⁡xall real xall real ysinh⁡ is one-to-one already
arcosh⁡xx≥1y≥0cosh⁡ is even, so we take the positive branch only
artanh⁡x|x|<1all real ytanh⁡ never reaches ±1
◆ The logarithmic forms all three on MF19
arsinh⁡x=ln⁡(x+x2+1),arcosh⁡x=ln⁡(x+x2−1) (x≥1), artanh⁡x=12ln⁡(1+x1−x) (|x|<1).

They are printed — but the syllabus says derive and use, so the derivation is examinable in its own right. It is the same three-step move every time.

Deriving arsinh⁡x=ln⁡(x+x2+1)
  1. Let y=arsinh⁡x, so x=sinh⁡y=ey−e−y2, giving 2x=ey−e−y.
  2. Multiply through by ey to clear the negative power — this is the key step: 2xey=e2y−1 ⟹ (ey)2−2xey−1=0, a quadratic in ey.
  3. By the quadratic formula, ey=2x±4x2+42=x±x2+1.
  4. Discard the negative root. Since x2+1>x2=|x|, the minus sign would make ey<0, which is impossible. So ey=x+x2+1 and
y=ln⁡(x+x2+1). ■

Step 4 is worth a mark on its own — you must say why the other root is rejected, not simply drop it.

Deriving arcosh⁡x and artanh⁡x

arcosh. With y=arcosh⁡x and x≥1: 2x=ey+e−y, so (ey)2−2xey+1=0 and ey=x±x2−1. Here both roots are positive, so the sign is decided by the range instead: the principal branch has y≥0, i.e. ey≥1, which selects the +. Hence arcosh⁡x=ln⁡(x+x2−1).

(The two roots multiply to 1, so ln⁡(x−x2−1)=−arcosh⁡x — the negative branch, and a favourite wrong answer.)

artanh. With y=artanh⁡x and |x|<1, write tanh⁡y with e2y:

x=ey−e−yey+e−y=e2y−1e2y+1 ⟹ xe2y+x=e2y−1 ⟹ e2y(1−x)=1+x, ⟹ e2y=1+x1−x ⟹ y=12ln⁡(1+x1−x). ■

The condition |x|<1 is exactly what keeps 1+x1−x positive, so the logarithm is defined.

§5 Solving hyperbolic equations

◆ Two routes — pick by what the equation contains
  1. Mixed sinh⁡ and cosh⁡ of the same angle ⟶ replace both by exponentials and multiply by ex to get a quadratic in ex.
  2. Double angles present ⟶ use cosh⁡2x=2cosh2⁡x−1 or 1+2sinh2⁡x to make it a quadratic in cosh⁡x or sinh⁡x, then finish with a logarithmic form.
✎ Worked example — route 1

Solve 3sinh⁡x−2cosh⁡x=2, giving the answer exactly.

3⋅ex−e−x2−2⋅ex+e−x2=2 ⟹ ex−5e−x=4.

Multiply by ex:  e2x−4ex−5=0, i.e. (ex−5)(ex+1)=0.

ex=−1 is impossible, so ex=5 and x=ln⁡5.

Check: sinh⁡(ln⁡5)=12(5−15)=125 and cosh⁡(ln⁡5)=12(5+15)=135, so 3(125)−2(135)=36−265=2 ✓

✎ Worked example — route 2

Solve cosh⁡2x−5cosh⁡x+4=0, giving the answers exactly.

Use cosh⁡2x=2cosh2⁡x−1 so that everything is in cosh⁡x:

2cosh2⁡x−1−5cosh⁡x+4=0 ⟹ 2cosh2⁡x−5cosh⁡x+3=0 ⟹ (2cosh⁡x−3)(cosh⁡x−1)=0.

So cosh⁡x=1 or cosh⁡x=32.

  • cosh⁡x=1⇒x=0 (the minimum of cosh⁡, so a single solution).
  • cosh⁡x=32⇒x=±arcosh⁡32=±ln⁡(32+94−1)=±ln⁡(3+52).

Because cosh⁡ is even, every non-minimum value gives a ± pair — dropping the negative one is the standard lost mark here. Numerically ln⁡(3+52)≈0.962.

§6 Interactive: build them from exponentials

The first view shows 12ex and 12e−x dashed: cosh⁡ is their sum, sinh⁡ their difference. Slide x and the panel checks the identities and the logarithmic forms numerically at that value.

cosh = sum, sinh = difference ✎

§7 Examiner traps & A* checklist

⚠ The seven most common mark-losers
  • Using cosh2⁡x+sinh2⁡x=1. The identity is cosh2⁡x−sinh2⁡x=1, and it is printed on MF19 — there is no excuse.
  • Losing a solution of cosh⁡x=k. cosh⁡ is even, so x=±arcosh⁡k for any k>1.
  • Inventing a second solution for sinh⁡x=k. sinh⁡ is one-to-one, so there is exactly one.
  • Quoting Osborn's rule as a proof. Prove from ex and e−x.
  • Forgetting to say why the negative root is rejected when deriving arsinh⁡.
  • Writing arcosh⁡x=ln⁡(x−x2−1) — that is −arcosh⁡x.
  • Ignoring the domain: arcosh⁡ needs x≥1 and artanh⁡ needs |x|<1. A "solution" outside those must be rejected and seen to be rejected.
★ Before you turn the page
  • Did I check whether the function I inverted was even (⟹ two answers) or odd (⟹ one)?
  • Are my exact answers in logarithmic form, simplified, with surds tidied?
  • If asked to prove, did I start from the exponential definitions?

§8 Video explainers (curated)

§9 Check yourself

Score 0 / 5
Q1 · definitions

cosh⁡x−sinh⁡x equals:

Solution

ex+e−x2−ex−e−x2=2e−x2=e−x. (Adding instead gives cosh⁡x+sinh⁡x=ex.) Multiplying the two results gives cosh2⁡x−sinh2⁡x=exe−x=1 — a one-line proof of the main identity.

Q2 · identities

sech2⁡x equals:

Solution

Divide cosh2⁡x−sinh2⁡x=1 through by cosh2⁡x: 1−tanh2⁡x=sech2⁡x. By Osborn, the trig version sec2⁡x=1+tan2⁡x flips sign because tanh2⁡ contains sinh⁡×sinh⁡. The last option is cosech2⁡x.

Q3 · logarithmic form

For x≥1, arcosh⁡x equals:

Solution

ln⁡(x+x2+1) is arsinh⁡x and 12ln⁡(1+x1−x) is artanh⁡x. The third option is −arcosh⁡x, because the two roots of the quadratic multiply to 1. Check at x=1: ln⁡(1+0)=0 ✓, and cosh⁡0=1 ✓

Q4 · solving

The complete solution of cosh⁡2x−5cosh⁡x+4=0 is:

Solution

2cosh2⁡x−5cosh⁡x+3=0 factorises as (2cosh⁡x−3)(cosh⁡x−1)=0, so cosh⁡x=32 or 1. Since cosh⁡ is even, cosh⁡x=32 gives the pair x=±arcosh⁡32=±ln⁡(3+52); cosh⁡x=1 is the minimum, so it gives only x=0. Omitting the negative branch is the trap.

Q5 · full method — try it on paper first

(i) Prove from the definitions that cosh⁡2x≡1+2sinh2⁡x.

(ii) Derive the logarithmic form of arsinh⁡x.

(iii) Hence solve 2cosh⁡2x−sinh⁡x=5, giving your answers exactly.

Solution

(i) Work on the right-hand side, in exponentials:

1+2sinh2⁡x=1+2(ex−e−x2)2=1+e2x−2+e−2x2=e2x+e−2x2=cosh⁡2x. ■

(ii) Let y=arsinh⁡x, so 2x=ey−e−y. Multiplying by ey gives the quadratic (ey)2−2xey−1=0, so

ey=2x±4x2+42=x±x2+1.

Since x2+1>|x|, the minus sign gives ey<0, which is impossible; so ey=x+x2+1 and arsinh⁡x=ln⁡(x+x2+1). ■

(iii) Substituting part (i) turns the equation into a quadratic in sinh⁡x:

2(1+2sinh2⁡x)−sinh⁡x=5 ⟹ 4sinh2⁡x−sinh⁡x−3=0 ⟹ (4sinh⁡x+3)(sinh⁡x−1)=0.

So sinh⁡x=1 or sinh⁡x=−34. Since sinh⁡ is one-to-one, each gives exactly one solution, and part (ii) supplies both:

x=ln⁡(1+2)andx=ln⁡(−34+916+1)=ln⁡(−34+54)=ln⁡12=−ln⁡2.

Check: sinh⁡(−ln⁡2)=12(12−2)=−34 ✓, and sinh⁡(ln⁡(1+2))=12((1+2)−(2−1))=1 ✓ ■

FP2 · Topic 8 · Hyperbolic Functions