Recognise the standard forms, substitute your way through the rest, tame a whole family of integrals with one reduction formula — then measure the length of a curve and the skin of a solid.
Scope note: surface areas of revolution for curves given in polar form are explicitly not required. Arc length in polar form is.
One more is worth knowing because it is not listed: since has the derivative of its denominator on top,
No modulus signs are needed — for every .
| Integrand | Integral | On MF19? |
|---|---|---|
| given | ||
| given | ||
| given | ||
| memorise |
The tell is the square root. With a root, you get an inverse sine or an inverse hyperbolic and no outside; without a root, you get and there is a outside. Mixing those two up is the single most common error in this section.
Find .
The quadratic is not one of the standard shapes, so complete the square: . Now it is the form with and :
Check by differentiating: ✓
Compare with — same idea, no root, so and a appears.
| Expression | Substitute | Because it becomes |
|---|---|---|
| , by | ||
| , by | ||
| , by |
Every one is chosen so that the identity kills the square root. Remember to convert as well, and — for a definite integral — to change the limits rather than converting back.
Find . Put , so and :
Convert back with , , and :
Check by differentiating: the two pieces give and , which add to ✓
Find . Put , so and :
using and then . With and ,
The two worked examples are the same problem with one sign changed — and the whole method changes from circular to hyperbolic to match.
For a definite integral, convert the limits at the moment you substitute. If and runs from to , then runs from to — and you never have to untangle at the end. It is faster and much safer.
Write for an integral depending on a positive integer . A reduction formula expresses in terms of or , so that repeated use walks you down to a base case you can evaluate directly. The engine is nearly always integration by parts, with the integrand split so that one factor differentiates towards the lower index.
Split off a single to be integrated, leaving to be differentiated:
The bracket vanishes at both ends: at because , and at because (for ). Now replace by :
has appeared on both sides — collect it, which is the step that makes the whole method work:
Base cases: and . So
Notice the pattern: even keeps a , odd does not — a quick check that you started from the right base case.
Let . By considering , find a reduction formula.
Differentiate the given product, then convert to so that only secants remain:
Integrate both sides from to . On the left, the integral of a derivative is just the bracket, and , , :
Check at : the formula gives , and directly ✓
When a question hands you a function to differentiate, that is the whole method — differentiate it, tidy with an identity, and integrate both sides.
A reduction formula alone earns nothing if you cannot finish. Always evaluate and explicitly, then say which one your chain lands on: with even walks down to , and odd to .
For a decreasing positive function on , the rectangle of height is too big and the one of height is too small:
Adding these over a range of turns a sum into an integral sandwich — which is exactly how you set bounds on a sum you cannot evaluate.
Show that .
Lower bound. Take , which is decreasing. On we have , so . Summing for , the integrals join end to end:
Upper bound. On we have , so . Summing for and adding the first term separately:
with equality when , where both sides are . Check at : ✓
Slicing into strips of width and taking the height at the right-hand end of each strip,
So a limit of a sum can be read off as an integral. For instance
The move that unlocks these is forcing a out at the front so that what remains is a function of alone.
Arc length
Surface area of revolution — multiply the arc-length element by :
where is whichever arc-length element above matches the way the curve is given. Surface areas from polar equations are not required.
A short piece of curve is almost a straight line, so by Pythagoras . Factor out whichever variable you are integrating with respect to:
and let the increments tend to zero. For the polar version, the element has a piece along the arc and a piece outwards, and these are perpendicular — so .
Rotating that element about the -axis sweeps a thin band of radius and width , whose area is — hence the surface formula.
Find the length of from to .
, and here the identity does something remarkable:
The square root disappears completely, so
Whenever appears in an arc-length question, expect this collapse — it is why the catenary is the standard example.
The arc of from to is rotated about the -axis. Find the surface area.
, so
The then cancels against the in the surface formula — the whole integral collapses to a constant:
Which is the surface area of a sphere ✓ — a complete check on the method, and a result you already trust.
Find the total perimeter of the cardioid .
, so
using . Taking the square root — and noting for — the curve is symmetric about the initial line, so integrate over half and double:
A curve built entirely from s and cosines has a perimeter of exactly — no at all.
Each scenario computes the answer two ways — the exact expression from the notes, and a straight numerical integration — and compares them. Where the topic is about bounds rather than an exact value, it checks the inequality instead.
exact vs numerical ✎
(for ) equals:
The form integrates to — all three root forms are printed on MF19. The distractors are , and . Note only the last, with no root, carries a outside.
To find , the natural substitution is:
turns into , so the root becomes and vanishes. suits , and suits — each substitution is chosen to match the identity that kills the root.
With and , the value of is:
is even, so the chain lands on : , then . The option is — odd descends to and can never contain .
The arc of between and is rotated about the -axis. The surface area generated is:
Each band has radius and width , so its area is . The second option is the volume of revolution, the fourth is the arc length, and the third forgets the factor altogether. Knowing which of the three is being asked for is most of the mark.
The arc of the curve from to is rotated completely about the -axis.
(i) Show that the arc length is . (ii) Find the exact area of the surface generated.
(i) , so by ,
taking the positive root since . Hence
(ii) The surface area is , and part (i) already gives :
Use the double-angle identity — you cannot integrate directly:
So .
Check: numerically , giving . The arc is about long at an average height of roughly , so a rough band area of — the right size. ✓